patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Board Certifies Tenure Charges Against Manalapan Principal

The Freehold Regional High School District certified tenure charges against Manalapan High School Principal Jeff Simon; the nature of the charges was not made public.

 

The Freehold Regional High School District voted to certify the filed tenure charges against Jeff Simon, the Manalapan High School principal who the district placed on administrative leave in December, at the Board of Education meeting last night.

According to Board President Heshy Moses, Superintendent Charles Sampson conducted a thorough investigation on Feb. 6 and filed tenure charges and a statement of evidence against Simon with the Board of Education. Simon filed a written statement of position in response to the charges within 15 days of the charges being served to him, in accordance with the law.

Moses explained that the Board acted as a “grand-jury” like entity, deciding whether or not there was sufficient evidence against Simon for the Commisioner of Education to determine Simon’s guilt or innocence and determine whether the conduct charges, if proved true, would warrant punishment.

Considering Simon’s written statement, the filed tenure charges, and the evidence, the Board voted in closed executive session, prior to the public meeting, to certify the tenure charges against Simon and forward them to the Commissioner of Education for a formal hearing.

According to law, all Board discussions regarding the certification of tenure charges must take place in closed session and not in public, Moses explained - twice. Additionally, the president stated that this issue is a matter of personnel and the Board would be unable to comment publicly on the circumstance.

Simon and his attorney, Stuart Moskovitz, attended the meeting last night in Marlboro High School’s auditorium, crowded with Simon supporters, and both spoke during public comment.

Simon said that he is “unfairly being victimized by a retaliatory, revengeful act in violation of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act”. Simon went on to say that “not a single one of the 12 charges is valid, truthful, substantiated with evidence, warranted, legitimate, or reason for tenure charges to be brought against [him].”

As Simon attempted to vocalize the full story of what he referred to as a “vindictive witch hunt”, beginning with an incident involving and administrator and a coach in September 2010, former Board attorney Steve Edelstein stopped Simon and told him he would not be permitted to air the details of his trial during public comment at a Board of Education meeting.

Simon said that in May of 2011 and in August of 2011 charges were brought against him, an investigation occurred, and all charges were dropped due to lack of evidence. Moskovitz said that the charges brought against Simon in May were aimed at keeping him from getting his increment and that they were “a retaliation for whistle-blowing against one of your administrators.”

And than on Dec. 12, Simon said he was blindsided when Sampson changed the locks on his doors and put him on administrative pay leave without warning, calling the superintendent's actions “aggressive, bullying, anti-Semitic and callous”.

Moskovitz said that the original charges brought against Simon in December when he was removed were refuted and that on Feb. 6, a new group of 13 affidavits came forward. Moskovitz went on to say that Simon’s 38-page response to these charges proved each affidavit false and that Edelstein was back in Manalapan last week “desperately trying to find something else.”

Manalapan High School students, parents, alums, police officers, and township officials came out last night to stand behind Simon and discuss their disappointment and frustration about the inexplicit nature of the charges and the amount this litigation will cost the tax payers.

Words like “inspiring”, “trustworthy”, “integrity”, “strength”, “great”, “caring” and the like were used last night to describe Simon, as over 25 people spoke in defense of his character.

Manalapan Mayor Susan Cohen and former Mayor and present Committeeman Andrew Lucas also came out in support of Simon. Lucas said that the township has formed a partnership with Simon and that there is no one they would rather have as a principal at Manalapan High School.

Cohen told the Board that residents are calling her everyday asking her what Simon did and that she is ashamed the Board voted before hearing the public speak on his behalf.

If the community members want to see a full list of the charges brought against Simon, the Board said they can file an Open Public Records Act (OPRA) request and send it over to Business Administrator Sean Boyce at 11 Pine Street Englishtown, NJ 07726.

Related Topics: FRHSD, Jeff Simon, and Manalapan High School

anonymous

12:44 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Why would this Board follow the recommendations of the law firm of Schwartz, Simon, Edelstein and Celso?? This is the same law firm who informed the previous Board that it was ok to pay for administrator's college expenses, prior to them taking the courses and that a phony doctorate degree from a non-accredited college is acceptable. The same firm that stated ex-Dr. Mr. Wasser had every right to call himself a "doctor." The same firm who encouraged the Board to go after anonymous bloggers; The same firm who said it would be a good idea to file ethics charges against a former Board member; The same law firm who negotiated the early retirement plan for former disgraced ex-Dr. Wasser--and, against Education Law--failed to have a public hearing on the matter. The same firm that unlawfully suspended former teacher Daniel Flynn without pay prior to the filing of any Tenure Charges or criminal indictment. Mr Flynn prevailed in that matter.

Read this complex and costly process this is going to cost us taxpayers: http://www.publicschoolspending.com/daily-updates/new-chart-illustrates-expensive-lengthy-process-for-firing-a-tenured-teacher-in-new-jersey/

If Mr. Simon prevails, he will have a costly--and justifiably so--retaliation lawsuit.

Reply

Curious George

5:43 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

I would like to know why, during the 3 1/2 years of the Wasser/Breyer St. affair, when the public was desperately fighting the board and the lawyers for permitting, excusing and abetting this unethical travesty to go on as long as it did, we never had one member from the Manalapan Town Council appear at any of the meetings to support the public in it's attempt to fight against the unethical behavior of the Breyer St alumni for obtaining bogus doctorate degrees, one of whom is still sitting on the board as the curriculum supervisor. Now, in the space of two years, when the principal of Manalapan High School is being faced with some unknown charges, do we suddenly have three mayors confront the board to defend Mr. Simon? When this incident first occured last year, former mayor Jim Gray and Mayor Lucas stood up and claimed that "rules are made to be broken." I would like to know how they would react if a member of the public addressed the council with those words. Yesterday, we again saw Mr. Lucas and the current mayor, Susan Cohen address the board to defend Mr. Simon. I am not taking a position for or against him since I don't know what the charges are. I really resent the fact that during the 3 1/2 years of the Wasser era, which was serious enough for the State Legislature to pass a law prohibiting what they did from ever happening again, that none of the board members ever thought it serious enough to make a public statement at any of the meetings.

Reply

Rick

5:55 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

We are paying for this travesty
The board chose to file the charges against Mr. simon BEFORE the public comment period. The president of the board "scolded" the public speakers BEFORE the first one had even spoken. The board chose to have two BULLY security guards on premises to remove speakers from the podium. The board continiously interupted speakers during their 4 minutes. The board is NOT a board is is a KANGAROO court.
We voted them in and we will vote them out.

Reply

jeg

1:15 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

What are the 12 charges? Why the mystery? Why do I have to pay the NJ state government record council to get a copy? Everyone wants to know so we can help defend Mr. Simon. Can someone just publish them!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Curious George

8:01 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

I don't believe you have to pay anything to OPRA any documents from the school board.

Jerry

1:40 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

This board takes our tax money and refuses to provide 100% transparency on what appears to be a personal vendetta. If Mr. Simon is willing to discuss the charges openly, who exactly is the board protecting by not commenting publicly? The answer is themselves. @Rick's last statement is 100% on the money. We voted them in and we will vote them out. Their day of reckoning is coming!

Reply

anonymous

8:49 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

The Tenure Charges process is going to cost about a half a million dollars. This district just received extra aid--oh well buh bye extra aid on this personal vendetta. I guess its not for the kids as I always hear. The Board of Education needs to stop this process now!!! Isn't this law firm that gave the district bum advice over the years and still made out like a bandit????? Weren't we supposed to rid the District of these leaches????? Shame on you Board of Ed.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Freehold Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks