patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Council Hears Charter School Presentation

A charter school presentation was given to the public and Council in hopes of fixing overpopulated classrooms.

 

Overcrowded Borough classrooms have made their way into the board room. A presentation at last night’s Borough Council meeting from the Beta Charter School was given to the Council and community members to further explain how a charter school could benefit overpopulated Borough schools.

Richard Ginn, a founder of Beta Charter, and Borough resident, gave a presentation to the Council and community on the benefits a charter school could give the Borough.

Ginn’s presentation acknowledged Borough school’s current population situation and explained some of the ways a charter school could help out students and the town.

“The reasons why we are here to talk about a charter school is about two simple concepts: efficiency and collaboration,” explained Ginn. “They relate both to the issue that is facing the town and I think we can all agree that the problem is a population and facility issue.”

Ginn further explained in his presentation that the typical reasons why a charter school is opened has to do with academic performance, the ability to give parents a choice in where their children can attend school, and for the flexibility of changing curriculum to better suite student’s needs.

Another important component to Ginn’s presentation was where money would come from to build a charter school. According to Ginn, funding to open a charter school would come from the state. He even provided figures that show how funding a charter school is less expensive than funding a public school.

After Ginn’s presentation, community members were able to ask questions to Ginn about a Borough charter school. The most common concern voiced after the presentation was where the money to maintain a charter school would come from.

“Yes it is true that initial costs to start a charter school are very low. However, over time the costs tend to increase as you add more grades to the school and as you need extra things for your facility the costs do increase. In towns with a similar structure to Freehold Borough, with only a few schools, these costs can be detrimental. We are already an under-funded school district and can not have those funds drawn away to go to another school,” was one comment made by Borough PTO member, Margaret Rogers.

In additional with Roger’s comment, Borough Board of Education President Annette Jordan, said that each child that chooses to go to a charter school would cost the borough $8,700.

"The Department of Education mandates that .1% of state aid that goes to a public school district would have to go to the charter school. That equates to $8,700 per student. That means that the district would have to reduce appropriations by $100 per student and that is just not possible," explained Jordan.

The issue of students going to a charter school was previously brought up at the Jan. 23 Borough Board of Education meeting, where Ginn addressed the Board during the public comment part of the meeting.

Additional concerns voiced by the public were the fear of “skimming” only the highest achieving students, and the fact that a charter school is not a guaranteed fix to the overpopulated schools and could potentially hurt the district more by opening. Reasoning behind that concern is because a charter school is open to all Borough students, even those that are home schooled or go to private schools. With all children able to apply, it is possible that the charter school could be filled up with students from other schools and could still leave Borough public schools over populated.

After the public voiced their opinions, the council spoke and expressed a similar opinion; that public schools needs to receive the proper amount of money from the state.

“I think the real problem here is, and I’m not going to sugar coat it, we have been given lip service from Trenton for way too long now. We need to tell Trenton to wake up. We need more money,” said Councilman Jaye Sims.  

The Beta Charter School has been speaking to local groups and organizations about bringing a charter school to the Borough and is still open to speak to anyone interested in learning more about charter schools. Currently, Beta Charter School is asking Borough community members to visit their website, www.betacharter.org and fill out their survey, regardless of their views on charter schools. Based on the community response to their surveys, the Beta Charter School will decide if they should continue to peruse bringing a charter school to the Borough.

Related Topics: Beta Chater, Borough Council, and Borough public schools

Richard Ginn

3:26 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Please note clarifications/corrections to the above article. The funding to open a building would NOT come from the state. I said in the meeting that by law funding for the initial renovation and opening of a charter school can NOT come from public funding from the local or state level. Funding to open the facility would come from a federal grant or private donations.

Reply

Kids1st

4:29 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

We can all agree that Trenton needs to do a better job funding public schools... especially the Boro. However, Chris Christie's top priorities include cutting taxes, balancing the budget and promoting charter schools. I don't see anything about sending districts additional money. We can continue to "hope" for more money from Trenton, but how is the Boro BOE going to address the overcrowded issue in the mean time? We need proactive solutions that address these issues without relying on Trenton.

Reply

Kirsten Raymond

12:44 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Min simple terms, I'm disgusted by this proposal for the clear and dangerous fact that a charter school would drain money from our already under-funded schools. Anyone truly vested in the Boro and our children would not even think to support or pursue this endeavor. I will all I can legally to ensure that this does not come to fruition for the sake of our students. Shame on Mr. Ginn.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dana Turner

6:33 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Shame on you for criticizing somebody for wanting to help with a situation that is in dire need. Do you have a better solution? What do you propose to bring back the library at Park Avenue that can no longer be used because it is 'classrooms'? How would you deal with the increased class size? Instead of being reactive perhaps you should become proactive.

Jane Healton

6:39 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Where in the borough would a new school be placed? This is a built up town and there are few open sites, certainly no empty buildings suitable for a school. It is true that the old Broad Street school building (sold for $1 many many years ago!) is up for sale but it does not have the grounds for outside activities a school should have.

Reply

Joe

8:20 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Why don't they get a large bus, pick up all the ILLEGALS and send them back to Mexico and BAM problem solved!

Reply

Doug Dale

8:39 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Charter schools are not the answer in Freehold Boro. With an open enrollment policy and limited space, the charter can pick and choose the academically highest students (which will boost any data that the school will use in the future to prove it's effectiveness) and leave the rest of the students and the Boro's public schools with even less funding as it takes public school budgeted funds away. Parents/residents should petition the Governor to increase state aid to public schools and tell him that the lack of education funding is not only an issue in Camden. The Boro needs the opportunity to build a new PUBLIC school. The Beta Charter isn't concerned with easing the overcrowding burden, it's focused on making money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

8:45 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

you are absolutely wrong! Build another failing public school? Public schools need competition. I am sick of teachers that have no knowledge of the course they are teaching that cannot be fired for any reason! We owe our children more, we owe America more and we deserve better!

Comment_arrow

Kids1st

9:41 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Mr. Dale: "the charter can pick and choose the academically highest students (which will boost any data that the school will use in the future to prove it's effectiveness) and leave the rest of the students and the Boro's public schools with even less funding as it takes public school budgeted funds away."

This is NOT TRUE (FALSE): It is illegal for any public school, including charters, to "pick" students. Any student who applies MUST be accepted. If the number of students who apply to the charter school exceed the space available, a RANDOM lottery is held. Please get your facts straight before posting incorrect information.

Mary Zengel

9:18 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Comments sound as if no one listened to the presentation
The initial funding does NOT come from the state and please who can say there is not enough space in town , open your eyes there is more empty spce and for sale buildings than ever before
My children went to private school andy grandkids go to private school because of how boro school are rated at DOE. A charter school will help increase education opportunities for our kids and increase property values
And I love the boro

Reply

Joe

9:50 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

we simply have to ignore the ignorant leftist comments regarding charter schools and proceed no matter what to give our children the very best education they deserve. The Communist radicals that run our public schools need to be run out of town!

Reply

Doug Dale

10:27 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Listen to yourself, Joe. Do you really need to say those kinds of angry things? Typical of a Republican start a name calling campaign to mask your own ignorance. Not to mention you do it w/o listing your FULL name. Classy.
@ Kids1st - You're right about the law of picking and choosing, I apologize for saying that. But, the law also states: "A charter school may establish reasonable criteria to evaluate prospective students which shall be outlined in the school's charter." Whatever they put in the charter could possibly be prejudice to smarter kids. I said "possibly," Joe. Don't go nuts. My issue is that once you take the "public" out of our schools and let private ownership take over, regulations can go out the window and the next thing you know, the charter is overcrowded, the public schools are now worse off w/o the funding that went to the charter, and the situation is back to where it is now. I'm not trying to be a naysayer. I want the best education for my kids too, but why not do our part to help what we have instead of bailing out and not looking back? Look at all of the revitalization of Main St. Let's promote the same pride and commitment to the public schools and not think that one charter coming to town is going to save the day.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

10:38 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

oh trust me doug I do listen to myself and others. The Public school system is a colossal failure at all levels. You live in a bubble, probably white, upper middle class and clueless. Go to Newark, Camden, Asbury, Irvington Patterson on and on and on. We have failed an entire generation of children because the NJEA has had a stranglehold on our BOE's I ran for the BOE. I was told " you cannot beat us" "even if you win, it will take 3-4 elections if you can find a candidate like yourself and win every election before you have a majority to change direction" The system is broken beyond repair, why don't you trust the parents and people that want a new system. And finally, do you work for the government in any role????

Comment_arrow

Kids1st

11:34 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

We can agree that we all want the best education for our kids. Here is the law in its entirety: 18A:36A-7. Student admissions to charter school
7. A charter school shall be open to all students on a space available basis and shall not discriminate in its admission policies or practices on the basis of intellectual or athletic ability, measures of achievement or aptitude, status as a handicapped person, proficiency in the English language, or any other basis that would be illegal if used by a school district; however, a charter school may limit admission to a particular grade level or to areas of concentration of the school, such as mathematics, science, or the arts. A charter school may establish reasonable criteria to evaluate prospective students which shall be outlined in the school's charter.

**As you can see, a charter cannot discriminate based on intellectual ability/aptitude, race, religion etc. I am not sure what the last sentence means: "reasonable criteria to evaluate students": However, this criteria cannot be aptitude/ability, race, religion etc. (It would be illegal).

I think this dialogue is important. Helping the current Boro public schools is always an option. Right now, the schools are over capacity and need more space. The charter would provide this space without the need for a tax increase/referendum to build/create an addition. If you were at the presentation the other night, Rick Ginn said he wanted to work with the Boro schools.

Joe

10:37 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

and Doug you make no sense, you claim that the charters will make overcrowding, regs out the window and a failing system, wait, don't we have that now? You don't even need a charter school in the Borough you simply need to merge with the Township! But wait, that's too easy!! And besides they don't want the Hispanic and blacks over there.

Reply

Doug Dale

10:58 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

There's no argueing with you, Joe (no last name). And I'm not even trying to do that. People saved downtown, people fix up parks, people make their houses and yards nice, why not save the schools too? Anywya, you're hypnotized by Republican sound bites and you're also a racist, so trying to make a point to you is, well, pointless. Fight for your cause and I'll do the same. Best of luck.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

12:04 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

racist, no doug, honest, willing too take it like it is, go hide behind your government job. If i were a racist why would I want the borough and the township to merge?

Doug Dale

10:59 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

And, I'm sure you'll need the last word, so have at it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

12:04 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

appreciate your thoughtfulness....

Joe

12:06 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

and by the way, dougie, I didn't say pick up all the Mexicans or blacks or Italians or Irish, I said get a bus and send all the ILLEGALS back, you do comprehend an illegal don't you or I guess you won't mind if I come over to your house and take what I want when I want it?????

Reply

Kirsten Raymond

9:12 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Dana - you're ok with taking money from our already under-funded schools? That's something to be proud of. And, Joe, what's with all the foaming at the mouth? This is not about liberal/conservative. Clearly your issues go beyond charter schools.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

9:18 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

are you my shrink or Mommy? THE ISSUES not my issues are about the best education for our children, my bet your a public employee or a teacher....

Comment_arrow

Joe

9:19 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

under funded school, the more we fund them the more the NJEA takes for benefits.

Comment_arrow

Joe

9:23 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Kirsten, why would you refuse the right to go to a school of your choice? As a woman do you support your right to abortion?

Doug Dale

9:51 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Oh! There's that "you must be a public employee" comment again, Joe! I looked at posts you left on other articles regarding politics and you always say the same thing. Just like what you do when try to argue your point. Hmm..lets see what Joe likes: Blaming govt employees, using unions as a scapegoat, hating the NJEA, sounds very Chris Christie to me. Get your own opinions and maybe we can take you seriously, JOEY!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

10:00 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

hey Doug, Interesting how you want my last name but you won't identify who you work for? Now which is more important to the public debate? Every tim I ask someone if they are employed by the government there is silence, oh no wait, then they start the name calling. IS a public worker a bad name? Seems so. SO now Doug, get off your high and might horse and have a Sensible debate on the cost of public pensions and health care, if you are capable that is

Doug Dale

2:23 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I suppose you are asking if I am capable because you think I am a public employee and that makes me not smart. Another "debate" tactic you and your fellow republicans like to do. Continuously insult people instead sticking to the topic of which you don't know much. You haven't had a post yet that I've read that hasn't said something derogatory towards someone. Which goes back to why you want to know if everyone who doesn't "think" the way you do works for the govt. What does it matter? Because knowing that is going to change anything you say? You'll just be more insulting and think you can change people's positions. Do I care that you DON'T work for the govt? It doesn't matter to me to have a discussion with someone based on their profession. It's based on the what they have to say. By the way, I'm a lawyer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

3:22 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

You know Doug, it seems that you are the one with some serious issues here. btw how and why do you think I'm a Republican? They teach you psychic
powers in law school? So let me try again Doug, do you have any "skin" in the game? Do you benefit in ANY way form the debate on public funding of ANYTHING? I can have an intellectual debate with you anywhere on any subject but you need to take a deep long breath and grow up!

Joe

3:25 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

and another thing Doug, I have no intention of changing anyone's opinion, I simply want the right of a parent to choose what school their children can attend! So my question to you is why deny that right? And I am not against any public employee that reasonably negotiates with their employee which by the way is the TAXPAYER!

Reply

Joe

3:34 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

oh yeah Doug how much do we spend in Newark to educate a public school system that cannot graduate over 60% of their students, oh yes, build another 75 million dollar school, that's it, we are simply not that advanced as a civilization to come up with a better solution, oh and btw my wife is a school teacher!

Reply

Marc LeVine

11:50 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

This is an interesting article from the latest Harvard Review regarding proposed ways to improve our existing schools. http://hbr.org/2012/03/rethinking-school/ar/1

Reply

Joe

12:09 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

Competition is the only answer. We have enslaved entire cities to a failed public school system and damaged African Americans far worse then slavery ever did!

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Freehold Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks