Report: Sandy Second Costliest Storm in U.S. History
The National Hurricane Center released its report on Hurricane Sandy Tuesday.
Hurricane Sandy was the second costliest storm in this country’s history and directly responsible for 147 deaths – 72 of them in the U.S. alone – according to a recent report released by the National Hurricane Center.
The report, released by the organization Tuesday, provides details about the start of the storm, its evolution as it made its way through the Caribbean up through the east coast, and its impact on the region.
Though the number is still tentative, owing to incomplete data, the report puts the total damage incurred by the storm at $50 billion, noting that the actual tally could be much higher. Even just factoring in its initial estimate, the storm is more expensive than any storm other than 2005’s Hurricane Katrina.
To read the report in its entirety, click on the PDF in the upper right corner of this article.
Sandy was also responsible for the largest number of hurricane-related deaths outside of the country’s southern states since Hurricane Agnes in 1972. Of the 72 deaths occurring in the mid-Atlantic and northeastern states, 41 were the result of storm surge, the report indicates. Falling trees and limbs killed another 20 people during Sandy.
Storm damage was extensive alone the east coast. At least 650,000 homes in all were either damaged or destroyed by Sandy, according to the report, with a majority of the damage caused by storm surge and waves. In all, roughly 8.5 million homes lost electricity during Sandy, with some areas not seeing their power restored for several weeks following the storm.
In New Jersey, 346,000 housing units were damaged or destroyed. Nearly 19,000 businesses sustained damages of $250,00 or more, with total business losses estimated at $8.3 billion. Power and gas line repairs are anticipated to cost approximately $1 billion, the report states, with water and sewer service repairs estimated to cost about $3 billion.
In addition to damage totals, the report also provides a look at Sandy’s impact along the shore. Though Sandy lost hurricane strength before reaching landfall in Brigantine, Atlantic County as a post-tropical cyclone, its size and sustained wind speeds of 70 knots, or just over 80 miles per hour, caused significant storm surges along the Jersey Shore.
The highest storm surge measured by the National Ocean Service (NOS) was at Sandy Hook in Monmouth County. There, the tide was measured at 8.57 feet above normal levels, though the station reporting the surge failed and stopped reporting during the storm. According to conjecture in the report, it’s possible that storm surge was much higher than that total.
In terms of tidal surge alone, Monmouth and Middlesex Counties saw the worst of it along their shorelines. During Sandy, surges in both counties were measured between 4 and 9 feet above normal tidal levels. In Ocean County, surges rose to between 3 and 5 feet above normal tides. Atlantic and Cape May Counties saw surges in some spots of between 2 and 4 feet.
As expected, the report states that New Jersey’s barrier islands were especially susceptible to tidal flooding during Sandy.
“Barrier islands were almost completely inundated in some areas, and breach in some cases, due to storm surge and large waves from the Atlantic Ocean meeting up with rising waters from back bays,” the report reads.
In areas like Seaside Park and Long Beach Island high-water marks were recorded at between 4 and 5 feet above ground level.
The NHC report also analyzed its forecast of Sandy, saying that genesis forecasts for the storm, despite its unwieldy size, were excellent. The NHC accurately predicated storm surges of between 4 and 8 feet along the Jersey Shore a full two days before Sandy made landfall.
Helaine
12:14 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Why havent we heard the real story that there was a 30 foot high wall of water that flooded homes in Union Beach within a matter of seconds. These were houses that were 6 blocks inland and had no history of water or flood issues. Now these people have no choice but to be at the mercy of flood insurance companies doubling or quadrupling their premiums. Hard working people cant afford $800 a month flood insurance premiums. Its either that or raise their homes to 15 feet above sea level. How many working people can afford another $80,000 bill, if they would even qualify for a 2nd mortgage. Its a very sad situation and no one is being told the truth. These flood insurance policies only pay a maximum of $250,000. and thats not what they are refunding to the people. Its a fight for every nickel. God Bless this country, we cant take care of our own citizens.
Peace Hale
4:36 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I have a house in union and I didn't see a 30' high wall of water. Sure I flooded and I am 5 blocks in but now I need to deal with it. Am I getting what I thought I should get from insurance, no, but it was my risk buying there in the first place. I can't wait to drop that piece of property now even though I'm going to take a major loss. It's just not worth living there anymore.
Dentss Dunnagun
4:29 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
I congratulate you P Hale you are one of the few that has taken responsibility (risk) for where you live and not blamed the government for not giving you money to pay for that loss .Far too many people think it's the duty of our government to give people money for everything bad that happens in their lives .....Good luck to you as well .
Peace Hale
4:38 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Oh and stop looking for 'our country' to 'take care of us'. It is victim mentality and entitlement attitudes like yours that are dragging the US down. Screw government and the insurance companies.
LGA
10:33 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Why shouldn't the government help us out? They send Billions in aid money to every country that has a disaster. Money, Food, Troops and such. Why can;t we help our own? We'll send trailers and tents overseas, but try to get housing here for families here and we get delays and 6 people in a hotel room and FEMA trailers sitting empty at Great Adventure. There's hundreds of vacant homes on FT Monmouth and Earle and all we can get is 42 units ready for people in 3 months? DISGRACEFUL! Guess now that the election is over, no one cares about us in Washington.
barbara dalessio
7:04 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I have flood insurance. I have had it since I bought the house which is over twenty years. So I think I have paid enough in to get what I need to repair my home and raise it.
jerseyswamps
7:56 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Costliest to who? After Katrina those with damage received what was expected. Since then Washington has changed the rules. For decades Washington said to those living near water "Don't worry, we got your back". After Katrina the new rules say "we're going to put you on your back". Those that received little or no damage will now have to raise their homes or pay obscene ins. rates. This storm will go down as the costliest ever to the victims.
Dentss Dunnagun
4:32 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
The only reason you MUST carry insurance is if you are indebted to someone ....
Ed Carew
9:32 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Fool me once. Shame on you. Fool me twice. SHAME ON ME!!!!