patching...
Breaking: Belmar's Boardwalk is Open For Summer »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Unknown

The Fiscal Cliff: More Like a Ski Jump

I have to hand it to the clowns in Washington and the greedy snakes on Wall Street — it seems all you hear about on every media outlet is the pending fiscal cliff. To hear them talk, it’s the end of the world. But just like the Mayan version a few weeks ago, it’s more BS that these few want you to believe. If no “deal” is made before the new year, tax rate and revenues will go up, and spending will go down.

Think about it – isn’t that exactly what Americans want, and what they just voted for in November? The tax rates will return to the Clinton era rates, when 23 million jobs were created, the economy grew substantially, and we had a surplus — not a deficit. What’s wrong with that? Add to that military spending cuts with two wars over, and you have a recipe for economic growth.  So what’s the issue?

Wall Street, the super rich, and big business do not want to give up any of their greedy gain made during the Bush years, which continued under Obama’s first term. For these greedy, there is never enough. They always want more.

So what will really happen when no agreement is made and tax rates and revenues go up? Well, at first the stock market will drop.  Maybe even substantially. And there will be a lot of clatter about companies laying off more people to maintain their “bottom line." But then the wiser — and likely the greedier — in business  (and eventually on Wall Street), will understand that a new normal is occurring.

This new normal will mean they will have to pay a fairer share of the costs of our society and government. This new normal where CEO pays fall from 475 times their employees pay, back nearer to 40 times as it was pre-1980’s. A new normal where business operating income percentage is reduced, but operating income dollars still grows, because the economic market is growing. A new normal where more people are employed, making liveable wages that they spend on housing, food, transportation and consumer goods. 

This will drive the economic growth that is needed, and create the tax revenues needed to reduce then eliminate the deficit.  

The rich will still get richer, just not at the absurd rate they are today, and not on the backs of the rest of us taxpayers. And Wall Street will recover, once they understand that getting a smaller return is much better than getting no return at all.  

So just like the Mayan end-of-the-world I say don’t worry about this fiscal cliff. It will be more like a ski jump than anything else.     

Wilson B Goode

8:06 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

If raising taxes on the so called rich which 250k in ny ain't it pays for 8 days of spending and we still have a trillion dollar deficit on top of 20 trillion of debt, what has this solved exactly? How will raising taxes on the rich create jobs anyway? Government jobs? What about the deficit due to spending too much? Please answer and enlighten me.

Reply

Gary Junstrom

8:32 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Gary Faraci - you have every left wing, liberal Democrat talking point down to a tee. What is the Democrat's obsession with raising taxes? That is the one way to lose jobs and lessen government revenues. When the Bush tax cuts went into effect, government revenues skyrocketed to the highest levels in history. Even JFK knew enough to lower tax rates to stimulate the economy. The problem now is spending - something liberals never acknowledge. We have more people than ever receiving food stamps, medicaid, welfare, etc. Welfare is now the biggest budget item - well over a trillion dollars a year. You may think taking money from people who earn it to give it to those who don't share our work ethic is your idea of "progress" but that's my idea of socialism and the road to Greece.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine

12:55 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

What was the tax rates under St Ronnie?
Is the Iraq war paid for yet?
did you miss the 800k a month jobs lost under Bush?
My idea of socialism is when oil profits are handed out to ppl just because they live in AK

Comment_arrow

Gary Junstrom

7:39 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

@elaine - your liberal anger and snarkey tone make your posts difficult to decipher, but here are a few facts you may find helpful. Until 2006, unemployment was low, treasury revenues were at an all time high, gas was under $2 a gallon, and the economy wwas humming along. Then, in 2006, the Democrats take over both houses of Congress. Everything goes south. The practice of giving mortgages to unqualified people caught up to us. These policies were forced on banks by liberal Democrats like Barney Franks and hastened along by sue- happy lawyaers like one Barack Obama. Now you know who to thank for the mess we're in.

No charge for the lesson

Comment_arrow

Elaine

9:09 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115279,00.html

nice try you might wanna read dis
or perhaps if your having trouble i ll pull it up on you tube
how about the facts I posted about the 47% are?
funny I didnt see you answer what the tax rate was under St Ronnie?
any idea gary who going pay for the the war in Iraq you know the ones based on Lies?
lower tax rates under Bush didnt work it led to a depression
Gee I wonder why ppl are on govt aid an older population and corp greed and corp welfare isnt you break over at wal mart? can i get a fry with my order Gary
my idea of progress is a saint like maddoff

Spooner

10:54 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Gary- in part I agree with you about the Wall St fraudsters, but citing Clinton' s realm has dubious connotations. Remember Clinton bought about NAFTA, which began the exporting of good paying jobs. Him and is wife wanted to reform the so called "entitlement" 3rd rail of politics programs, and he did cut defense spending. NAFTA was the beginning of the export of manufacturing jobs outside the country. People perceive the Clintons as liberals. Maybe that was true when they came to Washington, but today Bill Clinton is a believer in globalism(Globalist Initiative)

http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine

12:56 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

ya might wanna look at how many jobs were created under clinton well maybe you better not look you wont like it

Wilson B Goode

11:06 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Clinton added 40 percent to the debt net of any budget surpluses in his last 2 years. In 2007 democrats took over congress and budget deficits exploded. Remember congress creates budgets. Today's trillion a year is a result of increased entitlement spending. Medicare adds 600 billion a year to national debt In nov 12 the fed budget had a 170 billion one month deficit. More than all of 2007 under the spender bush.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine

12:57 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

any idea what the republicon plan is to pay back SS?

Wilson B Goode

4:26 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Cliff hardly.....more like a pothole.....

Here's the grand canyon. Obama's projected budgets

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/tables.pdf

in 2013 medicare/medicaid will spend 811 billon and take in less than 250 b in taxes.....smooth.....the rest borrowed from China.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine

1:37 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

Wilson

heres the 47% I think Mitt was talking about himself that is before he remembered he didnt wanna be President
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/09/the-47-who-they-are-where-they-live-how-they-vote-and-why-they-matter/262506/#

Republicon states Wilson

frank rizzo

12:36 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

it must be like being high all the time living in all of your fantasy worlds. bush tax cuts created millions of jobs and gave us the greatest economy since world war 2 (except for those unpaid for wars and medicare pt d as well as the $1.4 trillion in lost revenue from the useless bush tax cuts , the $1.6 trillion for the 2 bush wars and the $1.4 trillion in lost revenue for those same "tax cuts") then we all won the lotto and lived in gingerbread houses and lived happily ever after. the end.

Reply

frank rizzo

12:41 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

now for those who live in the real world clinton created 22 million non govt jobs. more than reagan , daddy bush or bush jr combined. bush jr being the sad sack of jobs clocking in at 1.9 million jobs according to the bureau of labor statistics. oh i almost forgot bush and his wonderful economy left us with a $10 trillion deficit and 700,000 jobs a month going down the toilet when he left. but that obama you know he is evil and is making a deal with china and the commies to hand over all our assault rifles so they can conquer us. dont worry if you tighten your tin foil hats a little more i,m sure more wacky conspiracies will surface. lol

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

8:05 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

Clinton didn't create those jobs, he just happened to be in office during one of the biggest tech growths in the history of the world. Clinton being in office had nothing to do w/ the birth of the internet, the birth of all the new computer companies and the dot.com age which brought about the great growth on Wall St.

Elaine

1:07 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

Frank

dont forget agenda 21, vaginal probes , legit rape, magic underwear, bridges to no where, oil subsidies, cutting SS and Medicare all wothy ratpublicon causes
didja know that christian conservative Sarah Palin was knocked up be for she got married
Tragg is now a devorcee after 18 long months and an out of wedlock kid
then you have Bristol who would be a welfare queen if not or mommy or on 16 and preggers
what a role model that Sarah is
dont forget she gets a check from oil profits making her a socialist
oh yeah Todds business partner was in her business lol

Reply
Comment_arrow

I have spoken

9:49 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

Looks like Elaine had too much to drink or her welfare check didn't cash yet. Typical DemocRAT statement. Stay away from your keyboard ubtil you're sober.

frank rizzo

1:13 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

i agree . even worse the bitter sad sacks on this thread like no goode and the fantasy world of gary junstrom are on every thread including one nominating pastor applegate for her good work with their fox babble. hannity must have been running extra shows this week or something.

Reply

frank rizzo

1:13 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

as for palin mc cain disgraced himself picking the car show model for vp.

Reply

Elaine

1:19 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

Who did the books for the Bush admin?
Was it the folks on Lacey rd?
They werent very good at it either
The Bush Admin forgot to put the wars on the books

Reply

frank rizzo

1:45 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

obama put the bush wars on the books for the first time in 2009. once the over one trillion got added to the budget those like willy no good and junstrom ran around the house yelling " look obama spent over a trillion in one day alone!". now because of this 6% approval republican congress trying to protect the donald trumps out there from getting a whopping 3% tax increase the rest of the 99% of americans are going to see hikes of anywhere from $1,000 to $3,000 less back in their tax returns this year. the most vunerable the seniors and disabled will have many services cut . these dopes like mc connel cant even pass the farm bill which will now cost every american $8 for a gallon of milk on jan 1st. mitch the turtle mc connel in the meantime voted all themselves raises and their gold plated health plans wont even see a dent.

Reply

Eleanor

6:23 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

The fiscal cliff exists because Democrats would not make tax cuts permanent. How come tax cuts are always temporary, but tax hikes aren't? And what is so wrong with being rich? Who goes around saying, I want to be really really poor. I think we need to stop looking at rich people as the ones to soak every time our politicians cant do what the rest of us have to do all the time - make a budget and figure out how to stick to it. So maybe there are 'fat cats' on Wall Street, but they dont owe me anything. It is my employees - the politicians in Washington - who should be accountable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine

11:20 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

"The Republicans say they want spending cuts to offset the postponement of the sequester spending cuts, but the Republicans do not appear to have proposed anything in particular" aint that the truth

Comment_arrow

Elaine

11:27 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

Eleanor

there is nothing wrong with being rich
but I gotta askya who is going to pay for the 2 unfunded wars, medicare part D the interest on the wars, do you know what the tax rates were under St Ronnie?
Not one word about foreign aid being cut
not a word on the military being cut
This country not matter what Bush said is NOT going to be invaded like we did based on lies to Iraq
come on Ocean county republicons admit it yall want the black jesus to fail but you want your fema checks as well

clamdigger

8:11 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

this so call fiscal cliff could be easily solved by institution a flat tax for EVERYONE, not a higher tax for the rich and none for the poor, everyone should pay.

also instituting a $0.05 cent national sales tax on any sale over $10.00. no matter what the item is, no matter what the final cost is, any sale over $10.00 would have just one nickel added to the bill. So whether you buy a pizza or a new car, $0.05 cents would be added to that bill then it's just sit back and watch those nickels roll into the treasury.

Reply

Robert Yates

11:10 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

This partisan bickering is laughable. Let me put it plainly. Both parties are equally responsible for the current mess this country finds itself in. The republicans spend enormously more than is required to defend this country. This includes monies spent on pre-emptive and unconstitutional wars (all with the tacit approval of the democrats) The democrats spend enormous sums on unconstitutional welfare programs (with the tacit approval of the republicans) And both spend obscene and criminal amounts on corporate welfare and crony capitalism while allowing the destruction of the US dollar by the federal reserve, which is currently printing 85 billion dollars a month of spanking new greenbacks to help "stimulate" the economy. This scuffle over the "fiscal cliff" is a smoke screen to distract from the fiscal calamity that is staring this country in the face. Neither the democrats nor the republicans are going to do anything about it.

Reply

Elaine

11:49 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

"here is the graph of the 47% -- a.k.a. "non-payers" -- by state. The ten states with the highest share of "non-payers" are in the states colored red"
I hate these pesky facts it just makes it so hard for the right wing nut jobs to twist the facts since they all live in denial
anyone know how Bristol would have supported herself? WELFARE

Reply

Where's Sam Samstie

8:58 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

How comforting to see liberals so completely dominate these blog comment strings...finally, reality, fact, reason, pragmatism, compassion, fiscal responsibility, accurate apportionments of blame/responsibilty prevail! This could mark the beginning of the inevitable marginalization and then demise of the pathetic remains of the once grand old party of reason and reality. It is been dead since 1994, rictussed since 2004, and now decomposing. Little putrid cells of anger, bigotry, frustration, and spite is all that remains - sustained in a petrie dish nourished by Fox News and a sickly, opportunistic coven of AM radio stations and internet websites. Here's to an honest, reality-based, rational, pragmatic party emerging from or outside of this morass to make things right.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary Junstrom

2:07 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

You shouldn't be so smug WHere's Sams Samstie, you are leaving out some important facts. The reason Obama doesn't want voter ID is because he can't cheat. He lost every state that had voter ID. The only reason Obama won was because of vot fraud. Look at swing state like Fl, Ohio, Virginia and Penn. There are 174,000 registered voters in St Lucies County Fl and they got 234,000 votes. Same thing in Cayahuga Co OHio, Penn, and a number of other states. The Democrats got voters lists for every state that doesn't have voter ID. Later in the day they would check who hadn't voted and send someone to the polls. That's why the lines were so long so late in places like Virginia and Ohio. Eric holder, for obvious reasons, refuses to address votr fraud. As for Fox News it has higher ratings than all the other liberal cable news combined. The reason is - people are fed up with the corrupt, inept mainstream news acting like an arm of the Democrat party. So I know you are feeling good because Obama stole this one, but it will catch up to him. His Obamacare taxes are starting to hit, unemployment is at 14%, and the Democrats are even looking to tax people on how many miles they drive. They won't be able to steal enough votes to counter that wrath.

More painful reality oh no

9:16 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

Elaine - Good stuff - see also that the states that get the most federal money per capita are the deepest red....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine

9:46 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

I try but its not easy
oh by the way no cliff thanks to VP Biden

Chica2ool

10:07 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

¡Muchas gracias Elaine and Frank Rizzo! ¡You both ROCK!

Reply
Comment_arrow

I have spoken

10:19 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

@Elaine and Frank Rizzo

It's people like you both and that POS president you support who allow Chica2ool and her anchor babies to get welfare, section 8 housing and other freebees that I shouldn't be paying for and should be for legit AMERICANS. DemocRATS are the problem with the USA.

Chica2ool

1:32 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

¡Muchas gracias to I Have Spoken & Feliz Año Nuevo!

Reply

Spooner

1:41 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Elaine- you gotta get beyond the Clinton era rhetoric when is comes to job creation. One of best sources of examining jobs and their details is the BLS...

"Earnings and employment trends in the 1990s" - written in March, 2000

...The stagnation in real earnings for much of the 1990s stands in marked contrast to the considerable growth in employment during that decade. As of December 1999, the end of the period examined in this article, the current economic expansion had lasted almost 9 years. During that period, total employment, as measured by the Current Population Survey (CPS), grew by more than 16½ million.

Previous research, using data from the CPS, showed that employment growth during the first half of the 1990s was concentrated in both relatively higher paying and relatively lower paying job categories, with a decline in the number of jobs paying midlevel wages...

http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2000/03/art2exc.htm

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

5:31 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Spoon, they don't understand FACTS...it confuses them

Elaine

1:52 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Spooner
what you have to get over is your denial that the Bush admin Lied about Iraq
didnt put 2 unfunded wars on the books or Medicare part D or the interest
somehow shedding 700 k jobs a month was either Clintons fault or Black Jesus
I gotta tell you loved the you tube vides of Bush and Brownie and Bush position on housing Did like the facts I posted as to whom the 47 percenters really are?
22 million jobs created under the Clinton Admin and that the reality of it

Reply

Elaine

2:12 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Its 2013 its time to put down the Ratpublicon Kool Aid come out of denial.
reality is waiting

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

5:30 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

wake up Elaine you're having a dream..oh wait you're a liberal you live in a dream world..no free phone for you.

Jackie Lee

2:52 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Where's Sam Samstie - Beautiful, poignant, devastating, and fun. You had to be stoned when your wrote it. Keep that bong torched and give us some more poetry, baby.

Reply

Eleanor

6:23 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Robert Yates made sense about the responsibility of our elected public SERVANTS- not rulers. And he managed to do it without the snarky name calling that is a turn off. When some people indulge in 'St Ronnie', 'Ratpublicon', bashing Bristol Palin, who has never used welfare (though the child's father has) - even bringing her into the argument - shows that the party that says it promotes tolerance, diversity and is against 'hate speech' may need to go in for a little self examination.
The government operates on the money that we send them. A large percentage of high earners send them a larger percentage of their money than lower earners and a significant percentage file no income taxes at all. All the talk about 'fair share' never addresses those who pay no share. And when the government does not take in enough on taxes, they have to look to loans or print up more paper dollars to support all of their programs.
Now a sensible person faced with a budget problem would look at his balance sheet and ask: Is everybody who owes me money paying me? Do I want to take on the interest rate in a loan? How can I fulfill my obligations (in the case of the government, the Constitutional obligations) and what really are my needs versus my wants?
This is not about President Bush anymore, not about Bristol Palin, Wall Street or any of the other diversions thrown into the mix. It is about how our hard earned money is being spent and if our public servants could do a better job.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jerseyswamps

6:33 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Nice, someone with something to contribute to the discussion. But I'm sure the usual suspects you mention will wake up soon and come around to mark their territory and bring the discussion down to a puppy's level.

Comment_arrow

wookfish

8:12 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

gonna ruin their day Eleanor,YOU make sense...new concept for them

Saw Sam Samstie Recently

9:31 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Eleanor - Right - It's not about Bush anymore as long as you acknowledge that we are still trying to clean up his mess (at lease one party is). It is though, as you clearly show, about people dragging down the economy, the discussion, the nation's spirit, by relentlessly blaming the least among us. And in your view, that is a big "least": 47% of your fellow Americans. You do it by falsely stating that they do not pay taxes (the fact is that everyone pays taxes). Relying on just one of many types of taxes to make your case is of course invalid. I assume you know better so that makes it deliberately disingenuous.
There is lots more fundamentally wrong with your position - foremost in the balance is that - typical of those who make your case - you completely neglect the essential matter of how would we deal with half of our population being denied any government assistance - including SSI, medicade and medicare, veterins bennies, disability, unemployment. And how would the costs to society of stopping those contributions compare to the current dollar savings?
But this is nuanced, reality-based thinking....not in your ilk's baliwick.
I say all of this knowing that it will not change your thinking one bit - other than to steel you up to defend it even more ferociusly and incorrectly.

Reply

Elaine

10:16 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Eleanor

try reading this
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/09/the-47-who-they-are-where-they-live-how-they-vote-and-why-they-matter/262506/

when your done with that
try this google corps that dont pay taxes
I see my posts have be erased by the folks on the right who dont want to see or read the Truth

Reply

johnathan

10:29 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Eleanor - someone erased your posts? I don't think it was those on the right because if you look to the right - there is no one there. Everyone seems to be to the left of you except Rand Paul - who by the way says idiotic, blatantly untrue things and is one of the tea party fools who don't even bother to find out what they are talking about. And how impressive that YOU, Elearnor are the speaker of the Truth!! That is also the problem with you Tea Party people, you think you have the Truth so you don't bother to hear anything that may contradict your so called Truth. Romney lost, Eleanor and I am sure the Tea Party reps who have tried again and again to destroy democracy by only adhering to their own particular Truth and not understanding that we have a system where compromise is necessary it is called checks and balances so no one Truth is adhered to - that is what Democracy is all about - a coming together of many truths - not just your Truth. And Sam Samstie, thank goodness you are back. Where have you been????

Reply

johnathan

10:35 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

And if Bristol Palin did not have a family to back her up - she would have needed welfare and medicaid to help her get through her pregnancy and child birth and that is what our country is supposed to do, unless you want our country to be more like 3rd world countries where young women in that position either have to go out on the street and beg or prostitute themselves. Is that what you people want? Go travel to some 3rd world countries where you will see disabled people on the street begging - is that what you people on the right want? Well - the voters said, NO that is not the country we want So Eleanor - you are out!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eleanor

2:06 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

@jonathan - I listen to the truth. What I don't listen to is name calling, needless bashing and drawing polarizing figures into an argument that has nothing to do with the topic. If you want my attention, you make sense and leave the nasty home. Start with the "idiotic" and "fools" and "St Ronnie" and I just tune out. Sorry - if you cant make your point rationally with a bit of good manners, you will have to limit your audience to those of your own point of view. And I think it is a wonderful thing that Bristol had a large family who stepped up for her, but she is also working (at a drs office, where she has worked for a few years while taking college courses) and has managed to take care of her son without much help or support from the son's father. What I want for women is not to make Bristols mistake, which was to get involved with a guy who obviously wasnt what a friend calls "marriage material" - poorly educated, unemployed (still is) and not a "keeper". The ideal situation would have been not to get into that situation in the first place. Feminism used to be about women moving up in the working world, taking advantage of educational opportunities so that they could be independent and self-reliant, it was not supposed to be about expanding the network of dependency for women.
And I have seen disabled, homeless people begging on the streets - in midtown NYC and downtown San Fran - two of the most liberal areas of the country.

Elaine

10:46 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Johnathan

any idea how Eleanor would try and spin this?
"There are some not-so-poor outliers, like the 7,000 millionaires who paid no federal income taxes in 2011. But for the most part, when you hear "The 47%" you should think "old retired folks and poor working families."

Reply

johnathan

10:59 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Right or Mitt's 13.5% on his many, many millions when the guy making $30,000 is paying 20% Eleanor is ruled by resentment -- but the trouble is - she resents the wrong people The poor have no power it is the rich who are manipulating and pulling the strings. Eleanor is one of the puppets maniupulated by the rich to keep them in power Resent the poor slob on welfare or the single mother with her kids on medicaid The problem with entitlements is Medicare - because old people -even those who are terminal get test after expensive test that they do not need - the doctors get rich and we all pay --- (and if medicaid is abused, who is getting the benefit besides poor people - the doctors that's who)

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

4:17 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

This is why I believe it’s time to move to a flat tax rate along with creating a national sales tax.
As I wrote the other day, if a $0.05 cent (one nickel) national sale tax on all sales $10.00 and over would begin funneling money into the treasury very quickly. So if you bought a pair of sneakers or a house, only 5 cents would be added to the final bill. It’s time for everyone to start paying into the system.

Here’s a quick example; Walmart makes $36M p/hr or $864M per day. They have 100M customers per week or 14,285,714 per day. That averages out to $60.00 per customer. Now let’s say only 13M customers spend $10.00 or more, that’s $650,000 p/day or over $237M p/year.

http://www.statisticbrain.com/wal-mart-company-statistics/

This is only one company in the entire country,just think of all the other retail chains,nail salons,lumber yards,mechanics,grocery stores,resturants,WaWa’s,Lowes and so on out there. Every transaction on Wall St can be included also. Any sale of any goods or services.

One person would have to make 20 $10.00 purchases to contribute $1.00 in a week.
The one nickel is just a bench mark to start with, if a dime, quarter or something in between works better then so be it, but this isn’t just a tax the rich situation. The majority of the country seems to want to be socialistic,so be it,everyone pays.

Samstie Rescued at Ready's

11:13 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Jonathan - Nice.

BTW - Samstie is around but not back - you must have heard about his Sandy experience (breifly - tides came up while he was in the portapottie at the OC annex building - portabottie was knocked over and it, with Samstie trapped in it, were carried down Asbury until it wedged into the back alley at Readys where he was pried out and hosed down by the kitchen staff on Tuesday morning - long story and best told by him)....I think his buddy Al Terego may be writing again though.

Reply

johnathan

11:55 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Wow that's some tale bout Samstie's super storm experience. Those guys at Ready's are the best - to make such a sacrifice and do the dirty work of prying him out. Personally, I would have had to leave him there as he just shakes things up too much in OC and is way too opinionated. And wasn't he supposed to get out of town like he was told? I think I heard a rumor he was shacked up at Eleanor's house during the storm, (she didn't leave either) so I think the whole porta pottie thing is just a fabrication to keep everyone's stellar reputation from being tarnished. Maybe others would never put Samstie and Eleanor cuddled up together during the storm, but I see and it works for me. Try to keep this rumor under your hat with the several other nasty little tidbits that swirl around when things get boring in wintertime. The visual of Eleanor and Samstie kinda hurts too.

Reply

johnathan

3:50 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Eleanor - you seem to have missed the point. Point being, if a woman is single and pregnant and does not have a family to rely upon, she needs a little help - not for eternity but a little help for a while and that help can come from the government. I want my taxes to help her and her child. (I mean if she can't get a reality show - like your little friend Bristol who purchased an extemely expensive house and I don't think she got that working for $10 an hour in a doctor's office. ) And I have traveled extensively all over the world and you cannot compare the few and far between beggars in NYcity and anywhere in the US with what I am referring to in Africa and India - places like that where there is an entire population living in the streets or mud huts with no electricity. You don't know anything, Eleanor but you are incredibly judgemental and mean spriited and your phony concern about manners is laughable. It is bad manners to judge others - you know - the whole throwing the stones if you live in a glass house thing. You do not speak for women of this era. You speak for women from another time warp.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eleanor

10:36 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

@jonathan I did not miss your point, but you did make mine, I spoke only to the issue. I did not drag in names, use derogatory terms or get personal. Yes, there are people who need help, but the best help you can give them is getting them back on their feet and then educating them as to how they might be able to avoid the situations in the future. The problem with dependency programs is that the funding, once instituted, never goes away. As I said earlier, it is a shame that tax cuts are always temporary but tax hikes never are.
As for my point about the rudeness of the left - my reference was to make a simple point, not to expound on the extend of my travels, because that was not the issue and I doubt my lengthy itinerary would be interesting here. You, on the other hand, who do not know me have said that I "dont know anything" that I am "judgmental" and "mean spirited" and "phony" and that I "speak for women of another time warp". The fact that you could not respond without making a personal attack against me undercuts any merit that your arguments may have had. In fact, the remarks about my "shacking up" with someone during the hurricane can be said to be libelous - I really dont care, you have answered the way the left usually answered. However the person who calls himself "Samstie" may take issue with having his name and reputation written about in that way. Why is it so hard for you to just address the issue without getting personal?

Joe

7:35 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

In observing this thread, I can't help but notice the sarcasm and vitriol of the pro Obama people. That is usually done to hide insecurities and lack of faith in a position. The sad part is - even if Obama took all the money of all the hated rich, he could only run the government for about 8 days. Obama cannot keep up this level of spending, tax hikes or not without the country eventually collapsing. He may get lotsa votes from welfare people, but if they are not contributing, they are just draining a finite pool of money. A parasite that kills its host does not have a bright evolutionary future. So the left-wingers who are doing high fives on this site remember, when this ship sinks, you go down with it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

7:47 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

everyone needs to contribute...case closed. the main priority which seems to established itself is people want socialism. People are mad at the fact there are others making more money than they are. People want to dip into the pockets of those who have wealth, even if it's just little more than they have. Everyone wants a new car, bigger house and all the little perks that go with it and when they can't get it it's because the rich don't want them to have it. gaining wealth takes work, years of hard work and sacrifice for the majority of people. Yes there are those born into wealth and there are those who inherit wealth, but those who want more out of the rich are those who will not go the extra mile to get ahead or make the necessary sacrifices such as time w/ family or long hours and hard work.

For all those who want socialized medicine,social programs, it's time to pony up and pay into a system that is able to garner money from every person not just a select group.

johnathan

7:49 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Ok Eleanor - you win Samstie did spend the storm stuffed into a porta pottie and was blown down Asbury and taken out of it and hosed down by Ready's staff - he did not shack up with you. I am sure, however, it was his loss.

Reply

christine

10:20 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Elaine..I'm not into politics and arguing over it..I just have a bit of advice,while making your arguments,stick to the facts,don't pepper in "dis" and "dat" and "yo" and "St Ronnie" in your points and comments..You would sound way more intelligent and less like a 14 year old boy..IMO

Reply

Al Terego

10:52 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Eleanor - Thanks for defending the honor and integrety of Sam Samstie - a true paytribute and protector of the middling class. There is no more devoted 1 placenta and part-time job creator in the puntitocracy.

http://oceancity.patch.com/blog_posts/sam-samstie-city-council-candidate-profile

Reply

Leave a comment

The Freehold Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks