Former Brookdale President Pleads Guilty to Official Misconduct Charges

Peter Burnham faces up to five years in prison.

Former Brookdale Community College President Peter Burnham Tuesday, accused of abusing his power as head of the county college.

Burnham, 68 of Colts Neck, pleaded guilty before Judge Thomas F. Scully to two counts of official misconduct and one count of theft by deception. Prosecutors say Burnham used credit cards issued to him by Brookdale to purchase more than $10,000 worth of items.

Under the terms of the plea agreement, Burnham faces a maximum of five years in prison. Pending sentencing, Burnham, represented by Toms River lawyer Steven Secare, could lose the entirety or a portion of his pension.

Burnham resigned from the college in March 2011 amid controversy over his contract and spending practices. Under the terms of his contract, Burnham received a housing allowance, a new car and had his country club membership paid for by the college.

During the 15-month criminal investigation, the state, with the cooperation of Burnham, uncovered fraudulent and misrepresented receipts for personal items. Gramiccioni said Burnham would approach the Brookdale finance board with receipts for items such as electronics, groceries, travel, meals and alcohol, and represent them to the board as items such as briefcases and office supplies.

The state also uncovered meetings which never happened, which Burnham used to justify travel and meal expenses. 

Burnham also pleaded guilty to using his son's tuition reimbursement, a clause in his employment contract with Brookdale, for personal use. Burnham agreed that Brookdale put $20,000 toward his son's education at Monmouth University between 2010 and 2011.

Days after Burnham's March, 2011 resignation, he instructed his son to apply for financial aid, which he was awarded in the amount of $20,000. Realizing it had been paid twice, Monmouth University sent a check back to Burnham's son, which Burnham deposited into a personal account.

Acting Monmouth County Prosecutor Chris Gramiccioni said Burnham's son is not the target of any current investigations.

"Mr. Burnham had known that his son's tuition had already been paid," Gramiccioni said.

Freehold Director John Curley said he had requested a line-item budget from Brookdale after the college discussed the possibility of raising tuition and had difficulty getting a hold of a copy. When he did obtain the requested line-item information, Curley said he was troubled with the spending by Burnham’s office.

"I was in essence a whistle-blower. There were other freeholders that complained, but I was the one that did the research and shot the gun," Curley said.

"It was me getting a copy of that budget and looking at the press office budget and looking at his contract and realizing what he had was heinous. And looking at all the expenses from the president's office it did not appear to be correct. From my business background, I just had a complete shock at what I saw."

Gramiccioni said the state is seeking $44,000 of restitution from Burnham.

"I think it is a sufficient sentence for the crimes," he said, noting Burnham's continued cooperation in ongoing investigations. 

Gramiccioni did not comment on current or future targets of state investigation. Burnham's sentence is set for Sept. 21 before Judge Scully.

"I've been speaking out on this for the past two years now, and I knew something was going to come down the line soon," Curley said.

Jacklyn Corley and Chelsea Naso contributed to this story.

Mike Rath July 24, 2012 at 07:29 PM
Reimbursement as well???
Kaitlyn Anness July 24, 2012 at 08:06 PM
Mike, yes--the state is seeking $44,000, the full amount they discovered Burnham spent using university money.
Big Whitey July 24, 2012 at 08:08 PM
The Freeholders who signed off on this should be fired as well. He will get no jail time, and keep his pension as well. Judges dont want to set a precedent of punishing public employees. Absolute disgrace. Curley should investigate Seven Presidents as well, they take in a lot of money.
Marlboro Mann July 24, 2012 at 08:33 PM
I guess this means we'll have to name a building after him.
Fred M July 24, 2012 at 09:51 PM
John Curley discoverered the problems at Brookdale Very early in his first term as Freeholder..Will someone tell me why no other Freeholders discovered these problems before Curley came into town? We need more John Curleys...
Marlee300 July 24, 2012 at 10:05 PM
What a POS! Imagine what he got away with that we will never know about!!!
bud July 24, 2012 at 10:54 PM
One of the real culprits in this picture is Lillian Burry who was well aware of what was going on here. She should resign immediately.
JoeburnedBone July 24, 2012 at 11:10 PM
20 lashes with a wet noodle!!!
Mike Rogers July 24, 2012 at 11:33 PM
This is why peices of garbage like this continue to abuse their power for their own personal gains. That 44k number is probably over 100k. They know that they will eventually get a slap on their wrist and get to keep their huge pensions. It's really sad that we the people have NO ONE looking out for our best interest. Our taxes keep going up and these crooks continue to line their pockets. This guy really needs to spend at least 1 year behind bars.
joe July 24, 2012 at 11:42 PM
Knew this guy was crooked when he first became president. Arrogant and smug too. Glad they caught the rat.
Fred M July 25, 2012 at 12:01 AM
I wonder how much county taxpayer monies out there are unaccounted for? Is Brookdale the only one? Lillian Burry needs to tell us why she never discovered this before John Curly arrived. Voters will still vote her in..
Fred M July 25, 2012 at 12:07 AM
Now if you really want to find out about perks..Ask to see the contracts of your local School Superintendents...The school boards will have to give you a copy..They will try to avoid doing so....They will want to know why you want a copy..Just tell them that you collect contracts a a hobby
Bagodoughnuts July 25, 2012 at 12:12 AM
Ya gotta make sure all the wheels are greased! Keep checking John you will find more scum!
RCPhoto July 25, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Why did his son apply for and receive financial aid when the family clearly had more than enough money to pay tution?
RCPhoto July 25, 2012 at 12:55 AM
I agree 100%. They are complicit.
Chief Wahoo July 25, 2012 at 01:34 AM
just keep paying those property taxes suckers !!! .....the public takers across NJ Thank you
anonymous July 25, 2012 at 03:41 AM
Simply unbelievable the corruption that is pervasive in Monmouth County. Now lets get going on more corruption from Monmouth County and seek all monies lost in this debacle. Lets also hold those responsible for this fraud. http://newjersey.watchdog.org/2012/05/14/conflicts-controversy-plague-dcj-investigation-of-lt-gov-guadagno-245k-pension-scam-investigative-report-by-mark-lagerkvist/
07748 July 25, 2012 at 06:08 AM
"I think it is a sufficient sentence for the crimes," he said, noting Burnham's continued cooperation in ongoing investigations. Wasn't the office of Birdsall Engineering searched by the Police of FBI recently? Birdsall was a BCC trustee, that might explain the cooperation.
Claudine Scozzari July 25, 2012 at 11:43 AM
Because the NJ Court system has placed the label of "WHISTLE BLOWER" to any paid individual reviewing budgets. When you review a budget, you review the budgetary line-items; hence, finding any 'issues' that may be something that can be fixed, improved upon, and quickly resolved saving the entire entity money. The legal system in this State by misusing the label of "WHISTLER BLOWER" now places everyone reviewing the budgetary line items in the same category of several real whistle blowers in the legal case law which have nothing to do with money or any numbers that have dollar signs. And, in most cases the whistle blower case is about the public's safety. The major corporation or business entity generally has shareholders to answer to and fixing the actual problem that would induce a more safe atmosphere would cause the shareholders to lose money. Misusing of funds is probably a more appropriate label for this type of situation for various reasons: 1. There is a dollar sign associated with the number. 2. There is budget involved. 3. There are receipts for items not in the budget. I agree. This county needs more John Curleys.
Claudine Scozzari July 25, 2012 at 11:58 AM
Yes! What was the search warrant for, and why did it take so long for the feds to question what was going on!?!? Where is the AG? What was going on at the local level? Over a decade of case law, the NJ Courts allowed it! Better yet, for more than the past decade (more like 2), what was the AG's office investigating? And, the feds are now issuing search warrants to these local outfits over cut and dry budget issues!!!!! If you want to be part of the USA, you better get your act together. The Richard Maser is a sitting member of the Board, as well. He wasn't immune to the problem.
Gary Parent July 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM
Thank God somebody took the time to look. We all need to be more vigilant, and to follow the rules!
jim p July 30, 2012 at 12:06 AM
he derves ntohing less than being trhown in jail and losing all his pension benefits.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something